May 21, 2013

Washington Capitals End-Of-Season Roundtable, Part I: What Went Right?

With the conclusion of Washington Capitals season, too early yet again, it’s time for appreciation, evaluation and critique. For the next seven days the Caps staff at District Sports Page, and a few friends, will be taking an in-depth look at what went right, what could be better, suggest some changes and grade out the team position-by-position.

Our panel: Dave Nichols, Editor-in-Chief of DSP; Abram Fox, Caps Team Editor of DSP; Katie Brown, Caps Beat Writer for DSP; Sky Kerstein, 106.7 The Fan and DSP contributor; Ted Starkey, SBNation.com and DSP contributor, Adam Vingan, NBCWashington.com; and Harry Hawkings, RocktheRed.net.

PART I: What was the Capitals’ biggest accomplishment this season?

DAVE:  The Capitals overcame tremendous odds after their near-fatal start to win the division and earn the No. 3 seed in the Eastern Conference, and the biggest accomplishment of the season triggered that impressive run: getting Alex Ovechkin back to being an elite goal scorer. The winger looked as lost as anyone the first three weeks of the season, and coach Adam Oates even resorted to playing him on a line with Jay Beagle and Joey Crabb, hoping their work ethic would rub off on the captain.

Success first came on the power play, where Ovechkin set up in his sweet spot in the left wing face-off circle. Once Ovi’s confidence was raised it spread to the rest of his game. He scored 23 goals in his last 23 games, resurrecting his reputation and the Caps’ playoff hopes. This team is only as good as their best player, so hopefully whatever Oates was able to do to get high production out of Ovechkin sticks around next season, as the Caps path to the playoffs will only get tougher with the move to the new division.

Ovechkin doesn’t have to score at a 50-goal pace — those days are gone — but the way the Caps are built he does have to be The Great Eight, and not just another forward, in order for the team to have success.

ABRAM:  Recovering from the wretched start to win the Southeast Division and finish with the fourth-highest point total in the Eastern Conference.

KATIE: It’s hard to point to one thing in particular, because many would argue an early playoff exit negates anything accomplished during the regular season. I think it’s important to recognize where Adam Oates was able to take this team in a short amount of time. They started 2-8-1 and were in the bowels of NHL rankings but rallied and went on to win their division and take the third seed in the Eastern Conference.

That seems like small potatoes next to the possibility of a deep playoff run, but I think where Oates was able to take this team is worth recognition. In summation, the Capitals’ biggest accomplishment was being able to bounce back from a terrible start, overcome injuries to their blue line and make the postseason, as well as benefit from Adam Oates’ system which I think is something that will translate to long-term success as well.

SKY:  Making the power play a strength and getting Ovechkin to buy into Adam Oates’ system/playing right wing. 

ADAM:  I think that’s fairly simple. The fact that the Capitals, left for dead by many at 2-8-1, were able to rebound and claim the Southeast Division with two games to spare is a feat in itself.  Consider this: From February 8 (the day after Washington’s 6-3 loss to Pittsburgh that dropped the former to 2-8-1) to the end of the regular season, only two teams earned more points than the Capitals — the aforementioned Penguins and the Blackhawks.

Lack of postseason success notwithstanding, the Capitals overcame improbable odds to even give themselves a chance to fail in the playoffs. Yeah, I know what I said.

HARRY:  I think that their biggest accomplishment was winning the Southeast Division, as much as it pains me to say.  Washington got off to a dreadful start, as we all know, and somehow turned it around in early March to go on a tear and make the playoffs as division champions.  When you look at what this team accomplished in 2013, this seems to be the only commendable achievement.  When just about everyone thought they were down and out, they found a way to put a nice stretch together and make the postseason for the sixth consecutive season.  But that’s where it ends.

Washington Capitals: Seasonal Disappointment for Fundamentally Flawed Team

The Washington Capitals are 3-6 now in playoff series in the Alex Ovechkin Era, and the franchise has yet to advance past the second round in that time. If you judge the success of an NHL franchise in playoff wins and Stanley Cups, the Capitals have not only been a failure, but a spectacular one at that. Of the six playoff series losses since the ’07-’08 season, the Caps have held a two-game lead in three of them, five have gone seven games and the Caps hosted Game 7 and lost four times. That’s not just losing, that’s losing badly.

Of course, you know all this already.

During the Ovechkin Era, the Caps have been eliminated from the playoffs in eerily similar fashion. They run into a hot goalie, and teams game plan to frustrate the Caps’ talented players by blocking shots and clogging up the neutral zone and passing lanes.

These teams: the Flyers, Canadians, the Penguins, the Rangers — twice (the Lightning sweep in ’11 doesn’t count), have simply shown more patience than the Caps and waited them out.  Eventually, and ultimately, the Caps shoot themselves out and their opponent waits and waits and counterpunches when the Caps run themselves out of the building. It’s not unlike a heavyweight boxing match when a lesser-skilled boxer will allow his opponent to wear himself down punching, then sneak in when he gets tired.

It happened in Game 7 again.

Look no further than the number of shots. Not on goal, but overall number of shots taken. The Caps attempted a grand total of 79 shots. 35 made their way to Lundqvist, and yes, he turned them all away. But Washington also had 27 attempts blocked by Rangers defenders and another 17 missed their mark altogether. The Rangers attempted 47 shots, 27 on goal. Five went in.

Every year the Caps are bounced after a grueling series and we hear the same things from the losing locker room. “We ran into a hot goalie.” “We thought we were the better team.” “We’re frustrated with the result.” I could go back and look up quotes but you know them as well as I do.

Here are this years:

“You can see one guy beat us. Of course they have good team, great players, great defensive team, but the goalie out there was unbelievable. That’s why he’s best in league,” said Ovechkin. “In my mind it was Lundqvist. They have great team, no doubt about it, but Lundqvist was unbelievable. Just unbelievable.”

And:

“It’s the same thing as previous years, I would say,” said Nicklas Backstrom. “We came back regular season then playoff came and we’re not good enough. I can just talk for myself and my effort. Not good enough. No excuses. It’s just a bad effort.”

And:

“We threw the kitchen sink at him at times and he stood there and defended,” Mike Green said. “He’s a great goaltender we knew that, we talked about it before the series how to beat him and the times that we did score was what we talked about. At times I thought we kind of got away from that. I’m at a loss for words.”

But it’s much deeper than that. Yes, Lundqvist is a world class goalie. Yes, Jaroslav Halak stood on his head for three weeks that spring. But the real reason these goalies have so much success over the Caps is that the shots that get through are lesser quality — from farther away — and from less dangerous areas of the ice. Look at the shot chart. You’ll see where the goals are scored during the playoffs.

The Caps got a grand total of 226 shots on goal in the seven game series, an average of over 32 SOG per game. That’s good. But they scored just 12 goals, a shooting percentage of just 5.3 percent. That’s beyond bad. It’s also a testament of where those shots are coming from. In the regular season, the Caps had ten players with a shooting percentage higher than 10 percent. In the series, that number was four.

Ovechkin, obviously, led the team in shots with 30 and scored once, for a shot percentage of 3.3 percent. Ugh. Is that the result of suffocating defense? A hot, world class goalie? An injury? Bad luck? Even during the period of Ovi’s toughest struggles the last couple of seasons, that kind of shooting percentage is simply anomaly.

But here’s the kicker: the next three highest shot totals in the series all came from defensemen. Karl Alzner, of all people, tied for third on the team in shots on goal with 19 (he was 15th on the team in the regular season with 39). Those are shots from the deep perimeter that have a very low chance of going in. And a team with Karl Alzner pacing them in shots on goal isn’t going to win very many series — no offense to Karl. He isn’t paid to light the lamp.

The Capitals are, essentially, a perimeter team. Ovechkin prefers to carry the puck and rush at the goalie, or get fed for one-timers at the face-off dot. Green shoots from the point. He has a wicked shot, but it’s from outside the circles, nonetheless. During the regular season, when defensive players are less apt to “sell out” to block shots during a grueling 82-game schedule, they have success shooting from their outside spots, with talented finesse playmakers like Nick Backstrom and Mike Ribeiro setting them up.

But during the playoffs, the book is out on the Caps. If you clog up the box, put all five skaters inside the circles to jam up the shooting and passing lanes, the Caps will get frustrated. Oh, they have a modicum of success early in the series, winning games early in the series until the opposition realizes the deal and really buys into it. But as the games creep closer to elimination, it works without fail.

There’s not enough room to operate between the circles. That’s one of the big reasons players like Backstrom and Ribeiro are neutralized in the playoffs. That’s often why you see players like Brian Boyle score in the playoffs: they’re willing to go to the net. But the Caps lack enough of these types of players. Just look at the shot totals from the series from the forwards on this team not named Ovechkin. No forward had more than one goal. Jason Chimera was the next highest forward in shots with 15. That’s barely two shots per game. And he was the best of the forwards named Ovechkin.

Look at the goals from the games the Caps won in this series.

– Game 1: Ovechkin scored his only goal of the series on a put-back off the back wall. Marcus Johansson on a breakaway on a great spring pass and defensive breakdown. Jason Chimera though a screen.

– Game 2: Mike Green on the power play in overtime from inside the top of the faceoff circle.

– Game 5: Ribeiro, at the top of the crease.

Only Johansson’s can be called a “pretty’ goal, and that was caused by a spectacular breakdown by the Rangers defense.

Philadelphia. Montreal. Pittsburgh. New York. These are all series where the Caps had home-ice advantage and lost Game 7. They all used the same script against the Caps. It matters not when the book is so clearly out on these Capitals. Stuff the box and they have no other way to score. And the Capitals will be moving into a division with three of the four next season, along with New Jersey and the up-and-coming Islanders. Their path to hockey’s holy grail just got infinitely more difficult.

I’m not advocating the Caps go back to playing Dale Hunter hockey. Far from it. These teams that play hyper-defensively do it because they don’t have the offensive capabilities of the Capitals. You don’t win a Stanley Cup playing that way, you’ll eventually run out of energy or bodies. You need to have a balanced approach, be able to make adjustments when presented with challenges and be willing to sacrifice both in the defensive and offensive zones. The Caps, simply, don’t have enough of those players yet.

The other part I want to mention is the whole “woe is us” mentality following these playoff ousters. Ovechkin’s comments about the officiating, the lack of calls in Game 6, and someone wanting to see a Game 7 were ridiculous and smelled of sour grapes.

“The refereeing… You understand it yourself. How can there be no penalties at all (on one team) during the playoffs?

“I am not saying there was a phone call from (the league), but someone just wanted Game 7. For the ratings. You know, the lockout, escrow, the League needs to make profit… I don’t know whether the refs were predisposed against us or the League. But to not give obvious penalties (against the Capitals), while for us any little thing was immediately penalized…”

For his part, Ovechkin also said that he, the other stars on the team, and the team in general simply didn’t play well enough, but offered no specifics in how or, more importantly, why.

GM George McPhee backed his superstar in his comments to the media Wednesday.

“I don’t think there’s a league conspiracy but it sure didn’t feel right. Alex wasn’t wrong,” McPhee said when asked directly about Ovechkin’s comments. “I talked to them during the series but at some point you stop. They’ll referee the way they want to referee.”

“I didn’t like the refereeing, but if you complain about it during the series and you’re accused of trying to gain an edge. If you complain about it after a series is over, then it’s whining and sour grapes.”

But Ovechkin’s not the only one wondering what happened. Here’s Eric Fehr, talking about both the points I’ve been trying to make.

“The Rangers must have blocked a hundred shots. It was crazy how well they kept us on the outside,” veteran Eric Fehr said. “They do a good job of it, and they are allowed to do a very good job . . . Holding and pushing, they are allowed to do pretty much whatever they wanted to do in front of the net.”

Every year teams complain about the officiating. It’s an NHL tradition as think as growing playoff beards. At some point though, these Capitals have to stop feeling sorry for themselves and take matters into their own hands. The way they collapsed after the power play ran dry at the start of the second period of Game 7 was palpable and disheartening.

The biggest difference between the Caps and the Rangers was evident in the third period. After the fourth goal, the Caps were skating at half speed, trying to get off the ice as fast as they could, and the Rangers were still blocking shots with a four, then five, goal lead.

I think Adam Oates has a pretty good idea what constitutes good hockey. He’s lauded as one of the smartest guys to ever play in the league. It took a little while this season, but he was able to find the way to rejuvenate Ovechkin and get him to play his best hockey in years. And not just scoring, but all-around. He was a better playmaker this year. He brought his physical game back. He skated better. Will that be sustainable? Caps fans have to hope so, because the success of this franchise is directly tied to Ovechkin being the “Great Eight”, not the mediocre or league-average Eight.

I also think that Oates still doesn’t have the roster he wants or needs to be successful. After Ovechkin and Backstrom, there’s a serious drop-off in talent. There’s also a significant lack of power forwards on the team. Why did the Caps turn to 19-year old Tom Wilson in Game 5 of the series to make his NHL debut? His size and willingness to play in front of the net. There is a dearth of that on this team. The Caps hope and pray Wilson turns out to be their Brian Boyle or Milan Lucic, and could stand to add another player or two like him.

This column might sound like I’m down on the Caps. I’m not. The last 35 games of this season showed that they can be a force to be reckoned with in the NHL. They didn’t do it with smoke and mirrors, they did it by outplaying the teams on their schedule. But there are significant holes in the roster. Their level of competition will get higher next season. And they are fundamentally flawed when the ice gets shorter in the playoffs.

The Caps have a little under $6 million available under the cap for next season, and that’s before trimming some dead weight off the roster and evaluating their own free agents. We’ve said this for a while, but it’s a crucial off-season for GM George McPhee. Coming into this year, it looked like the Caps weren’t counting on having a season at all with the lockout. The turnaround showed promise after the near-fatal start, but there’s lots to do this summer.

The almost-free path to the playoffs that the Caps’ Southeast Division schedule afforded them is gone. That playoff revenue is critical to the Capitals organization, and it just became much more difficult to obtain.

Oh, and I didn’t even mention the goaltending, which I’m not completely sold on. But that’s a post for another day.

Washington Capitals Cleanout Day Audio: The bosses

Audio courtesy Sky Kerstein.

The Washington Capitals held their final media availability Wednesday after their ouster from the playoffs by the New York Rangers for the second year in a row. Below is raw audio of George McPhee and Adam Oates’ press conferences.

“I don’t think there’s a league conspiracy but it sure didn’t feel right. Alex wasn’t wrong,” McPhee said when asked about Ovechkin’s comments about the officiating. “I talked to them during the series but at some point you stop. They’ll referee the way they want to referee.”

“I think over the course of the summer you’re gonna think about a lot of little things and evaluate yourself,” Adam Oates said about his first season as a head coach in the NHL. “You try to think of mistakes and what you could have done better and all the little things.”

05-15-13 George McPhee Presser 1

05-15-13 George McPhee Presser 2

05-15-13 George McPhee Presser 3

05-15-13 George McPhee Presser 4

05-15-13 Adam Oates Presser 1

05-15-13 Adam Oates Presser 2

Washington Capitals Cleanout Day Audio: The players react

Audio courtesy Sky Kerstein.

The Washington Capitals held their final media availability for the ’12-’13 season Wednesday at Kettler Capitals Iceplex following their ouster from the playoffs by the New York Rangers for the second year in a row. Feel free to listen, if you haven’t yet suffered enough.

05-15-13 John Carlson Presser RAW

05-15-13 Braden Holtby Presser RAW

05-15-13 Brooks Laich Presser RAW

05-15-13 Karl Alzner Presser RAW

05-15-13 Matt Hendricks Presser RAW

05-15-13 Michal Neuvirth Presser RAW

05-15-13 Mike Green Presser RAW

05-15-13 Mike Ribeiro Presser RAW

05-15-13 Nicklas Backstrom Presser RAW

OPINION: Why do you root for the Washington Capitals?

Why do you root?

Do you root for the Washington Capitals simply because they are the home team? Do you root for the specific personalities on the team, and will stop rooting for the Caps when they no longer wear the sweater? Do you follow the Caps because you’re a fan of the NHL and they are the local team?

Do you root for the Caps because you expect them to win?

The Washington Capitals certainly test the limits of fandom. For those of us that have been around since the beginning, the answer might be different than the newcomers that have been rocking the red only since the coming of the Ovechkin Era. Judging by the reactions to Monday night’s collapse against the New York Rangers in yet another Game 7 loss, there’s a lot of anger– maybe even a different kind of anger — than in year’s past.

The situation is the same: Caps take an early lead in the series, fail to close it out early, and allow lesser known role players to beat them when the stakes are highest. Joffrey Lupul. Jaroslav Halak. Arron Asham. The names don’t matter any more. It’s been happening for close to a decade now. No one can be blamed for accepting a defeatist attitude around these parts anymore. It almost seems as much a sign of spring as the cherry blossoms.

In years past, fans have expressed disappointment, frustration, anger. But something’s different this year. The reaction borders on outrage. It’s as if for a certain segment of the fan base, the fact that the Caps lost was a personal affront to their well being, livelihoods or family security.

I get disappointment. We all want our teams to win. I understand frustration, especially when it seems like every year they’re one goal away from advancing. But anger? Outrage?

Maybe the lingering resentment of the lockout is subconsciously fueling this new reaction to getting dumped from the playoffs. Maybe the continuing sameness of the manner in which the Caps exit the game’s biggest stage is to blame.

Sports entertainment is supposed to be an escape, a release from the mundanity of day-to-day life. It isn’t supposed to add to the misery. Fan bases take a different personality in each locality, especially on the east coast. New York fans have an arrogance about them that mirrors the attitude of the city. Philly fans have that special brand of obnoxious that comes from the collective inferiority complex from being wedged between New York and D.C. Boston fans have an insular pride that can only come from Boston.

In Washington, though, a certain segment of the fan base has a sense of entitlement, like they are owed something. Maybe that’s an extension of the over-achiever personality that draws so many to D.C. in the first place. For a city that’s main industry is politics and law firms, I guess that’s not too hard to understand. If you’re accustomed to always getting what you want, and what you want is out of your control, I suppose I’d react with anger when I couldn’t get it as well.

This social commentary isn’t aimed at the fans of hockey. It’s aimed at the fans of winning. Hockey fans know that hockey is hard. Only one team wins every year. People complain the Caps haven’t yet won the Stanley Cup in their almost 40 years of existence. The Rangers have won once in the past 70 years. Seriously?

If you’re angry that the Caps lost again, that’s your right. And I’m not here making excuses for the team. I’ll have a column very soon about my feelings of how the team is constructed and their elemental flaws. But I’m a hockey fan. I enjoyed watching the Caps this season rebound from a seemingly disastrous start to win the final Southeast Division title and the third seed in the Eastern Conference. I enjoy the personalities that make up this team. I enjoyed watching Alex Ovechkin rediscover himself this season.

Maybe I’m just too numb to the losing, I’ve been watching it for almost 40 years.

Am I disappointed the Caps didn’t advance? Sure I am. But am I angry they lost? No. It’s part of hockey.

I’m a fan of hockey, not a fan of winning.

Washington Capitals Eastern Conference Quarterfinal Game 7: Capitals end season with crushing 5-0 loss to Rangers

“All we needed was one, to be honest,” said Washington Capitals defenseman Mike Green after the Capitals’ season-ending loss to the New York Rangers in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Semifinals.

“Last night, just needed one to get us going. Tonight, we just needed one.”

Sometimes all it takes is the one lucky bounce, one lucky break, one goal, to get a team going. But the Capitals weren’t the beneficiaries of any such thing Monday night. Following a loss to the Rangers at Madison Square Garden in Game 6 on Sunday, which tied the series 3-3, the Capitals hoped their win streak on home ice would keep going. But it was not meant to be. When it was said and done, the Capitals fell 5-0 to the Rangers, which ended their 2013 season.

The mood in the locker room was somber. A season-ending loss in the playoffs is harder to swallow than a regular season loss. Hockey players know that. The Capitals know that. Many of them have experienced only playoff failure during their careers. Nicklas Backstrom is one of them.

“It feels like deja vu. It happened before,” he said.

Backstrom was asked what lessons the team could take from this season.“Maybe learn how to play in the playoffs, I would say. It’s the same thing as previous years.”

Sentiments were much the same around the room. Things like these take time to process – coach Adam Oates responded to many questions by saying “ask me in a couple days.”

“It’s as tough as it gets right there,” said Eric Fehr. “It’s really disappointing. We played a hard series and we’re not even sure what happened tonight. It wasn’t good.”

He’s right – it wasn’t good. The Capitals weren’t good, and Henrik Lundqvist and the Rangers were better.

Oates summed it up the best he could for the moment, but seemed at a loss, like many of the players. “Quite honestly, it’s tough to explain. It’s funny how over the years the seventh game turns into some form of blowout. I wish I had an answer for that. Obviously, we pushed very hard in the first period, even made a lot of great saves. They got a lucky one and every bounce seemed to go their way after that.”

This is playoff hockey, and the nature of the beast. Things could just as easily had gone the Capitals way. Things will surely become clearer for the players and coaches over the next few days, the wound will begin to heal, and they will take these lessons and move on to next season.

FIRST TAKE, GAME 7: Rangers snuff out Caps offense and dismiss them from playoffs

The Washington Capitals fell to 3-9 all time in Game 7s, 2-7 at home, as the New York Rangers withstood a great first period by the Caps, then took a stranglehold on the game, scoring twice in the second and twice in the third to beat the Caps 5-0. Once the power play expired at the start of the second period, you could see the Caps completely deflate and the Rangers jumped allover them, using their lesser talented players to outwork — and eventually outscore – the Caps.

It was, quite obviously, the second year in a row the Rangers dismissed the Caps from the Stanley Cup Playoffs in a Game 7.

– The Caps dominated the first period everywhere but the scoreboard, holding a 32-16 advantage in shot attempts. Only 13 of the 32 attempts made their way on goal though, as the Caps had 13 attempts blocked and another six misfires.

– Ovechkin made his presence felt physically, if not on the scoresheet, with seven hits in the first, including several dramatic open-ice hits. He also pinned Ryan McDonough along the boards with a devastating hit, causing blood to leak from McDonough’s right cheek and forehead. The defenseman had to go to the locker room to get repairs but returned to the ice.

– 19-year old rookie Tom Wilson had a strong period, getting into good position for two shot attempts.

– The goal by the Rangers’ Aaron Asham came as a result of Mike Green getting caught in the Rangers’ end after a rush, but it’s a shot Braden Holtby should have had. You can’t let Asham beat you on a snap shot from the top of the circle, but Holtby whiffed with his glove hand, which made it a 1-0 game after 20 minutes.

– The second period was an unmitigated disaster for the Caps. As soon as the power play that carried over from the first expired, you could see the wind escape from the sails. Both New York goals came as a result of the Caps simply not being able to control the puck in their defensive end, wilting to the relentless forecheck of the Rangers’ lesser-known players. The second goal, Eminger to Dorsett to Pyatt, might be the least offensively gifted goal in a Game 7 in NHL history. There’s no excuse.

– Ribeiro, Fehr and Brouwer was the forward line on the ice for both New York goals in the second period.

– If you give up goals to Aaron Asham (2 goals in 27 games), Taylor Pyatt (6 goals in 48 games) and Mike Del Zotto (3 goals in 46 games), you kind of deserve to lose.

– I’m shocked Holtby didn’t get lifted after the third goal. Oates had every right. His team needed a jump, Holtby wasn’t tracking the puck well, and a 3-0 hole in Game 7 is a dramatic enough excuse. But Oates stuck with Holtby, reinforcing Holtby’s unquestioned status as the No. 1 goalie in town — for better or worse.

– I don’t even know how to describe the New York goal 13 seconds into the fourth period. Erskine way too nonchalant with a soft pass up the boards. No speed to get back. Holtby might as well not even had a stick as he was flailing it about purposeless, allowing a soft backhand to beat him with what was a three-goal deficit. Pathetic.

– To show the big difference between these two teams, the Caps played most of the third period at half-speed, just trying to get the game to end, while the Rangers were still using their bodies to block shots on the Caps’ late power play. It’s in their DNA — both ways.

We’ll have a season recap soon. But for now, hang in there Caps fans. They did some good things this season. Adam Oates looks like a keeper. And Ovi rediscovered who he was. The change of division next season will add to the excitement, even if it seems so far away.

Washington Capitals Pregame Update & Audio for Game 7: Oates, Chimera, Fehr

Audio courtesy Sky Kerstein

The Washington Capitals did not have a pre-game skate in advance of Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Quarterfinals against the New York Rangers. Head coach Adam Oates, along with forwards Eric Fehr and Jason Chimera, each had a brief pre-game availability.

Oates announced that neither Brooks Laich nor Martin Erat would be healthy enough to dress for Game 7, but say that he was considering a roster change. The most likely scenario would see either Joey Crabb of Wojtek Wolski dress instead of 19-year old rookie Tom Wilson, though Oates did not indicate the specific player move.

For Oates’ comments, plus those of Chimera and Fehr, please click the links below.

05-13-13 Adam Oates Pregame RAW

05-13-13 Eric Fehr Pregame RAW

05-13-13 Jason Chimera Pregame RAW

Washington Capitals Eastern Conference Quarterfinals Game 6 Recap: Lundqvist shuts out Caps to force Game 7

If you’re a fan of the Washington Capitals, you had to have figured it would come to this.

The New York Rangers — facing elimination in their own building — drew five power plays to the Caps none, their world class goalie played up to his legendary status, and one bad bounce — a deflection off his own defenseman — slipped past Braden Holtby, and the Caps fell to the Rangers 1-0, forcing an all-deciding Game 7 at Verizon Center Monday night at 8:00 pm.

Derick Brassard, a thorn in the Caps side all series long, was credited with the lone tally of the game — a slap shot from the high slot that deflected off Steve Oleksy’s glove at the top of the crease and caromed past Holtby midway through the second period.

The Capitals did not play particularly well for long stretches of this game, had trouble mounting a consistent offensive attack and, at times, had trouble getting out of their own end due to New York’s relentless forecheck.

But the story of this game, unfortunately, was the officiating. Referees Brad Watson and Marc Joannette called five penalties in the game before the final horn, and all five were against the Capitals. Two of the calls — against Jack Hillen and Mike Green — were for retaliation after a Rangers player instigated the rough play. Another — Eric Fehr’s elbowing call — seemed to actually come as a result of the Ranger player’s own gloved hand making contact with his face — if at all – after the two players collided shoulder-to-shoulder.

There have been two instances in this Stanley Cup Playoffs of the home team receiving all of the power play opportunities in the game. Watson and Joannette were the referees in both contests. That the Caps were ale to kill all five penalties is a testament to their renewed proficiency in the penalty kill — and the Rangers ineptness on their power play. New York is just 2-for-26 with a man advantage in the six games in this series alone. In contrast, the Caps have been successful on three of the 14 power play opportunities they’ve had in the series.

None of this should come to make light of the job Henrik Lundqvist — or Braden Holtby, for that matter — did between the pipes in Game 6. Both goalies were outstanding; Holtby early during the multiple power plays the Rangers had in the first period and Lundqvist particularly late, when the hard-charging Caps had the better of play 5-on-5, and then 6-on-5 in the last 80 seconds of the game when coach Adam Oates pulled Holtby for the extra skater.

It should also not be disregarded that the Capitals should have figured out a way to play physical without taking the retaliatory penalties. If the Caps fail to hold home ice advantage Monday night and lose this series, the biggest story from the Capitals side will have been their inability to stay out of the penalty box the entire series.

That being said, the Caps played a man down for long chunks of Game 6 and it disrupted their line combinations, offensive attack and game plan.

The Rangers were awarded their first power play at 10:01 of the first period. Replays showed Jack Hillen received a blatant and intentional “chicken wing” style elbow to the side of his head by Rangers’ captain Ryan Callahan. Hillen responded with a hard cross-check to Callahan’s chest and was whistled for roughing. The call itself is dubious, as NBC’s color analyst Pierre McGuire described it: “I’m not sure that’s a penalty. I think that’s more of a ‘Captain of the New York Rangers on home ice against a young man out of Colorado College in Jack Hillen’ and that’s one of those where the veteran got more of a break.”

NBC never showed the play that instigated Hillen to retaliate though. However, TSN’s coverage did pick up the elbow, and you can make up your own mind to the nature of it.

Six minutes later, the delay-of-game bug bit the Caps again, with this time normally reliable defenseman Karl Alzner guilty of the infraction. As the Caps were in the process of killing that penalty, Eric Fehr and Brassard came together in front of the Rangers bench. Both players braced for impact and they collided shoulder to shoulder. Fehr, the taller player, followed through and got the better of the impact, with Brassard flailing wildly to the ice. But upon closer inspection, it appears that Fehr’s elbow never did make contact with Brassard and if anything, Brassard’s own gloved hand nicked him as he reeled from the collision.

Regardless, the dramatic fall that Brassard took — along with the heavy hit Fehr doled out — resulted in a 5-on-3 situation (the third of the series, all favoring the Rangers) as the frame wound down, which the Caps killed off deftly.

The third period saw two more calls go the home team’s way. On the first, Joel Ward was called for cross-checking a Rangers back-checking forward into the Rangers goal. Both players had speed and Ward got a good piece of contact. Had the hit happened at open ice, I don’t think anyone would have thought about it, but the Rangers forward went careening into the goal, knocking it from its moorings. Again, the hit was shoulder-to-shoulder, but Ward got sent off for a cross-check.

The final infraction came against Mike Green for a cross-check. He earned it, going two-handed across Derek Dorsett’s mouth, drawing blood on his top and bottom of Dorsett’s mouth. But the play that precipitated the retaliation this time was Dorsett’s check on Green — a dangerous “slew-foot” type maneuver — that so incensed Green to go after Dorsett. After the game, several Capitals’ players talked about what they perceived as the dirty play by Dorsett, a lesser-skilled player on the ice primarily to instigate and “stir the pot.”

Via Capitals Insider: “The one that we all had a problem with, obviously, was the one on Greenie. That’s a play that should be reviewed,” goaltender Braden Holtby said. “It’s only because Greenie’s world-class, one of the best skaters in the world, that he didn’t fall on his back there. It’s a dirty slew foot and we’re short-handed from it. That’s the only one I think any of us have a problem with.”

As a testament to the physical nature of play in the series, and the escalating ugliness throughout Game 6, after the final horn sounded all 11 skaters on the ice came together in the corner to the right of Lundqvist and engaged in some more extra-curricular activity, which ended up with Green on the ice prone, trying to protect his head. Both teams were assessed two roughing minors: John Carlson and Troy Brouwer for Washington, and Derek Stepan and Dan Girardi for New York.

All of this sets up what should be a tense, physical, dramatic Game 7 Monday night at Verizon Center at 8:00 pm. Neither team has a particularly good history in this situation. The Caps are 2-6 at home in Game 7s, the Rangers are 0-5 on road in Game 7s. One organization’s tortured fan base is going to be able to cling to a ridiculous “curse” after Monday night, but you can rest assured those numbers mean nothing to the players.

FIRST TAKE, GAME 6: Lundqvist stymies Caps; Game 7 Monday

Henrik Lundqvist stopped every shot that made it through to him, and the New York Rangers escaped Game 6 with a 1-0 win over the Washington Capitals. The Caps were hindered all day by killing penalties, as the refs awarded five power plays to the Rangers but none to the Caps. Regardless, the Caps weren’t able to find an answer for Lundqvist, forcing the seemingly inevitable Game 7 at Verizon Center.

– Though outshot (due to accumulation of power plays for the Rangers) in the first period, the Caps had the much better of play at 5-on-5, penning the Rangers in there zone on multiple occasions.

– Caps had better of play in a rough first 20 minutes, but they were unable to find a way to play physical without going to the box. Both Hillen and Fehr penalties came when physical confrontation was 50/50. Caps lost the whistle in both those occasions at MSG. On the Fehr penalty, it looked like the hit was shoulder to shoulder and the Rangers player hit himself in the mouth with is own elbow.

– Ovechkin lazy on defense? Not in the first period, where on back-to-back shifts he filled the goal crease during a scrum on the far post, then blocked two shots in a sequence when Caps were forced to deal with defensive zone face-off after an icing.

– Obviously, a huge penalty kill at the end of the period with Alzner off for delay of game and then Fehr joining him on the roughing. Killing almost a minute of 5-on-3 then the rest of it is a big boost of morale.

– Rangers scored on a deflection off Oleksy’s glove on a shot from the high slot by Brassard. On the replay, it looked like Holtby had it tracked all the way until the last second deflection. Looked like Oleksy tried to punch at it and just didn’t get enough of it to push it off goal.

– Energized by their tally, Rangers really had the best of play in the last eight minutes of the second. Holtby made several huge saves, including a sequence when he lost his stick, to keep the Caps within one goal. Ovechkin had a couple of chances in the frame only to be denied by Lundqvist.

– The third period was furious, including about 80 seconds of 6-on-4, but Lundqvist was equal every time the Caps got one through.

– Hard to believe the Rangers didn’t commit a penalty in Game 6, but they were not called for one, while getting the benefit of five power plays. Caps are fortunate that the Rangers power play is inept (0-for-5 in the game, 2-for-26 in the series), but fighting off power plays will take its toll — and keep Alex Ovechkin off the ice.

Game 7 is Monday night at 8:00 pm at Verizon Center.